Rohr International's Blog ...evolved capital markets insights

Informed observations on international capital markets & global politico-economics ...with extended ideas on major market trend implications

  • Required Reading Risk Disclaimer
  • About Rohr
  • Subscription Echelons & Fees
  • Tours
  • Contact Us
  • Required Reading Risk Disclaimer
  • About Rohr
  • Subscription Echelons & Fees
  • Tours
  • Contact Us

Testing Trauma

April 13, 2020 Rohr-Blog Leave a comment

2020/04/13 Commentary: Testing Trauma

© 2020 ROHR International, Inc. All International rights reserved.

Extended Trend Assessments reserved for Platinum Subscribers

COMMENTARY: Monday, April 13, 2020

Courtesy of Globe & Mail. ©2020 All Rights Reserved.

There’s an awful lot being tested in medical, financial and psychological realms. Another of our old market axioms is, “You can't trade the market you ‘want’; you can only trade the market you ‘have’.” The sudden change into conditions which are not consistent with many folks' experience is causing stress for medical professionals, the public, politicians and market participants.

As noted in Thursday’s ‘Colossal Cross Currents Indeed’ research note, the massive government response still flies in the face of less effective actions that may mute its impact. And that is regardless of the recent addition of further massive Fed actions (FOMC multifaceted program link https://bit.ly/2JTGfra) that are going to leverage all of the major US Treasury funding for rescue programs.

The good news is US EQUITIES are maintaining their ‘triumph of hope over reason’ bid, likely due to further upbeat assertions of US politicians that the recent erratic start to the COVID-19 rescue programs will be addressed soon. Yet despite this Brobdingnagian financial support, the flow of the funds has been obviously less than effective.

Among others in the political class and business folks, successful entrepreneur and sports franchise owner Mark Cuban laid out fine line developments in a CNBC interview (https://cnb.cx/2K0auNj) on how problems are defusing the potentially positive impact of the major Paycheck Protection Program (PPP.)   

In some ways the traumas are interrelated under the massive impact of COVID-19. Among the other aspects of the ‘testing’ nature of the situation, one of the most obvious and telling is at the politico-economic nexus. It is a lot of trauma for President Trump. Despite his trumpeting (pardon the pun) his effective shutdown of Chinese-US travel in late January, he continues to deflect on his less effective steps in weak US response to the (at some point obvious) threat from COVID-19.

The three most obvious forms of late are his claims the US has ‘great testing’ (which seems in part an attempt to deflect criticism for actually being behind the curve on this necessary component of safely reopening the US economy), that he took effective action at all points, and that as President he has “absolute power” (that is a direct quote) to direct the states to reopen their economies even though he never instituted a national social distancing and economic shutdown policy.

 

Constitutional Short-Course

On the latter, it is a bit scary watching Donald Trump repeatedly claim in a live press conference that as President he has “absolute power”; it goes to a fear that he is as extreme a megalomaniac as had been feared based on previous words and attempted actions. It also speaks of the man at the top having a distinct lack of understanding of the US constitution and federalist system. It seems the President would prefer to be running the government he’d ‘want’ rather than the one he ‘has’... and this is not the first time he has acted in this manner. 

And he shut down the repeated questions on this by accusing the inquisitors of being ‘bad reporters’ asking ‘unnecessarily negative questions’. Yet the expert opinion is clearly not on his side. As a Reuters article (https://reut.rs/3cjwe2C) that was updated Tuesday morning notes, “...a US president has quite limited power to order citizens back to their places of employment, (and other measures.)” In fact, respected NY Governor Cuomo has said he would ignore such an order if it was inconsistent with the best interests of the health and welfare of his constituents.

 

Typically Misdirected Government 'Rescue'

And the government response so typically has the cart out in front of the horse, even if a necessary psychological step at this point. This was clearly laid out in a March 25th City Journal interview (https://bit.ly/3a33cD2) of the estimable Paul Romer, the crux of which he has repeated in recent live interviews. In the first couple of paragraphs he explains the current disconnect between what is actually needed and the US (along with other governments’) response: supporting the incomes of workers without providing them any incentive to feel safe.

That is the only thing which will encourage them to go out and actively engage in the economy. As we (among many other, more highly qualified folks) have noted, he posited, “We need widespread, regular testing to figure out who should be in quarantine and who should be allowed, at least provisionally, to get back to their regular lives: back to work, back to producing, earning income, and spending.”

 

Testing Key to Limiting Reinfection

Highlighting an informed opinion on this, we return to the previously referenced article in Toronto’s Globe and Mail (https://tgam.ca/3dwzBoi) on when and how social distancing can end (or at least be reduced.) Especially note the graphs a bit lower down on ‘flattening the curve’ of the infection spread, and even more so the one below on what is necessary to fully suppress the pandemic’s impact. Admittedly the latter does not include any assumption of rapid response testing, and the chances are this would mitigate obvious worst-case scenarios. 

Yet the Trump administration remains unprepared despite the President’s claim that, “(paraphrased) we have the tests and ours are the best.” This is just untrue, especially in the context of ‘rapid response’ tests, which the US lacks.  The reality is also that they would need to necessarily be repeated on a regular basis to monitor and implement selective quarantines, instead of the current destructive general quarantine. Romer covers it all in the interview.

While CNN’s Jim Acosta is not our favorite reporter, Trump and Pence responses to his questions at a recent press conference (https://cnn.it/34Bv8No) highlights the disconnect. [Trump for the first 45 seconds, and be sure to catch the CNN fact checker’s brief discussion from 03:25 through the end of the clip.] The ironic bit right now is the place on earth where it is easiest to get tested and be provided a rapid response: Wuhan. That’s right, possibly due to the major origination there.

Authorized Silver and Sterling Subscribers click ‘Read more…’ (below) to access the balance of the opening discussion. Non-subscribers click the top menu Subscription Echelons & Fees tab to review your options. Authorized Gold and Platinum Subscribers click ‘Read more…’ (below) to also access the Extended Trend Assessment as well.

 

 

Read more...

Rohr Market Research

The Big ‘Dis…’

March 25, 2020 Rohr-Blog Leave a comment

2020/03/25 Commentary: The Big 'Dis…'

© 2020 ROHR International, Inc. All International rights reserved.

Extended Trend Assessments reserved for Platinum Subscribers

COMMENTARY: Wednesday, March 25, 2020

US COVID-19 Cases Map Courtesy Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. All rights reserved.

In modern slang that term means ‘disrespect’. And there is certainly no small amount of that going around… most recently in the US Senate’s sharp partisan barbs that members threw at each other in a manner not seen for many years. That was based on highly divergent views on the phase 3 COVID-19 economic rescue legislation. Should it contain additional funding that goes way beyond the essential financial support to individuals and companies during the current social distancing economic shutdown? 

The rolling debate on that has belied all of the recent assertions that the rescue package is a ‘done deal’. Consider the announcements into early this morning that the Senate had passed its version of it which was such a fillip for the US equities and others. Yet here we are this afternoon listening to House Speaker Pelosi saying that in deference to their sensibilities, her members would get ‘at least’ a full 24 hours to review the legislation before being asked to vote on it. So no vote until Friday morning… maybe.

Wonderful, except for one factor: as recently revisited again, the old axiom remains, “The market is a creature of expectations.”  And the poor markets are having a hard time knowing what to expect in the context of these rapid ‘agony and ecstasy’ (apologies to Irving Stone) rescue effort reversals. That has fostered another ‘dis’… disorderly price activity in the context of how critical that government action is to any sense the US and other global economies are going to come through this in good order.

 

Legislative Lollygagging

While the Republicans are also guilty of their own legislative shenanigans at times, the Democratic ‘asks’ in the case of this hypercritical situation were a bit outrageous. As noted previous, Pelosi & Co. were demanding quite a few items that are far removed from getting emergency financial support to businesses and individuals. Even a partial list hints at no small amount of, in psychological terms, dissociative (there’s that ‘dis’ again) behavior... like a split personality.

‘Nice Nancy’ wants to ‘look out for the little’ in the face of another ‘corporate giveaway’. However ‘Hard Bargaining Nancy’ is willing to sacrifice the essential timely passage of the rescue package on the altar of what Senate Majority Leader McConnell has rightly characterized as a ‘liberal wishlist’. After counselling his troops on their objections to some spending items in the phase 1 rescue legislation “"...gag and vote for it anyway", he was faced with the following demands from the Democrats (just a partial list):

Eliminate the US Postal Service debt; wind and solar tax credits; impose emissions standards on aircraft manufacturers and airlines; extension of nonimmigrant visas; corporate board diversity quotas; same day voter registration; even major funding for The Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts… and it goes on and on from there. It seems they are following the advice of top Obama advisor Rahm Emanuel (from 2009), “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste” ...regarding the ability to use it to further a broad agenda. (That’s real: https://youtu.be/1yeA_kHHLow.)

Yet as we have noted previous, her and Senator Schumer should wake up to the fact that the ‘little guy’ (who will soon be in the bread line) doesn’t give a damn about any of that. They want to know they can pay for their next meal, and won’t appreciate it if the companies they work for go bankrupt waiting for the ‘more enlightened’ Democratic Party approved rescue package. Holding up funds flowing at this critical time in an attempt to ‘shoehorn’ in the Green New Deal they can’t get passed during normal times is not the little guy’s idea of support.

The latest House shenanigans are going to make for an interesting market psychology into the weekend. And not just for the US equities. There will be some influence into the global govvies and developed economy currencies. Yet the impact from any further stall in the legislation passing will likely be far more major for the already recently slammed emerging currencies.  

 

Disconsonant Dissembling Don

All of that said, it is also important to consider the ‘Disconsonant Dissembling’ (more ‘dis’) noted in last Friday’s research note. There are more than a few folks in government and the press who are guilty of ‘spinning’ their partisan view in a manner dissociated from the facts. However, the Trump administration’s attempt to paint everything in a favorable light leaves it less than effective in a way (as we noted two weeks ago) that has left an empty ‘well of confidence’.

This may seem inconsistent with Trump’s still relatively low approval rating rising through the course of the crisis. Yet that could be more so due to him taking a more presidential tone at the COVID-19 expert press conferences than any actual higher level of effective action. While we had already referred to his disconsonant dissembling in last Friday’s research, it is worth revisiting briefly to show it remains an issue on any truly effective address of the crisis in the US.

The Dissembler-in-Chief’s serial misstatements or outright falsehoods had already led to the emptying of the ‘well of confidence’ (March 12th research note on that.) The US government failure on the lack of COVID-19 testing kits has led to the message from Trump as recently as Thursday that, (paraphrased) “...if you have no symptoms, there is no need for you to get tested.”

In the context of the COVID-19 two-week ‘stealth’ (i.e. asymptomatic) contagion period… that’s crazy! An extensive Reuters article (https://reut.rs/3a2NyZh) referenced previous, reinforces the evidence that South Korea was far more well-prepared that the US to counter the COVID-19 spread. That was simply by identifying the necessity, and ramping up their COVID-19 tests production. They put their private pharmaceuticals companies on a ‘war’ footing (language Trump has belatedly adopted), and demanded massive COVID-19 test production for extensive testing; even of asymptomatic individuals.

By comparison the US lacked, an continues to lack, leadership on testing. Trump’s inability to allow a major problem was coming (not possible on his watch) versus seeming very demure and (falsely) assuring the American public that the government had it under control was a major failure.

Quite a bit of blame has been laid at the feet of a ‘bad’ old system for medical device approval. And that is true to some degree. Yet Trump came in as the ‘get it done’ kind of leader who could slash ‘red tape’. And in that regard his inability to shove the old rules aside to motivate the private pharmaceutical sector to solve the problem of a lack of test kits (as South Kores did) is a signature failure of his administration.

 

Still Averse to Testing?

This has led to the disconsonant dissembling that is cover for failure. Successful testing had allowed South Korea to close down selective areas of its economy. The alternative for the testing-deficient US is wholesale quarantine shutdown of much of the economy. It appears to us that a Trump who did not appreciate the severity of the situation and move timely to sweep away the red tape that prevented the US from ramping up test production must now maintain the party line that testing is not necessary for the asymptomatic.

While we will return to that shortly, first we’d like to share a very good COVID-19 resource: the Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/) that has so much accurate and relevant information. Also note a link fairly near the top to the COVID-19 Interactive Map (the source for this post’s opening graphic.)

This is a great actively updating and easily manipulated graphical and statistical resource, which will provide the real story regardless of what the politicians are saying. Along with other features, clicking on specific countries on the left sidebar will provide ‘Confirmed’ cases and ‘Daily Increase’ graphs on the lower left… very interesting. (Check out the graphs on that for South Korea.)

Getting back to Trump’s rear-end-covering aversion to testing even at this critical time, the sheer cost of the major US ‘social distancing’ shutdown has now caused him to develop a new fixation: reopening the economy as soon as possible to mitigate the cost. This means by possibly as soon as Easter Sunday on April 12th. That’s just 18 days from today, even as the virus is obviously still spreading into new areas.

 Authorized Silver and Sterling Subscribers click ‘Read more…’ (below) to access the balance of the opening discussion. Non-subscribers click the top menu Subscription Echelons & Fees tab to review your options. Authorized Gold and Platinum Subscribers click ‘Read more…’ (below) to also access the Extended Trend Assessment as well.

 

    Read more...

Rohr Market Research

What Price?

March 19, 2020 Rohr-Blog Leave a comment

2020/03/19 Commentary: What Price?

© 2020 ROHR International, Inc. All International rights reserved.

Extended Trend Assessments reserved for Platinum Subscribers

COMMENTARY: Thursday, March 19, 2020

'Blonde on Blonde' album cover ©1966 courtesy of BobDylan.com

To state the obvious, the markets’ trading volatility (wild short-term swings) has been part of broader trend volatility on the major overall price moves. This has not only been the case on the major overall weakness of the US EQUITIES (and others) and EMERGING CURRENCIES, yet now also extreme swings in the fiscal concern-impacted GLOBAL GOVVIES as well.

It seems the US government and its minions were as unprepared to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak as they were to fathom the full dimensions and impact of the 2008-2009 financial crisis. It reminds us of the line from the old Bob Dylan tune ‘Stuck Inside of Mobile with the Memphis Blues Again’ (©1966 Bob Dylan, 'Blonde on Blonde'),  “An’ here I sit so patiently, Waiting to find out what price, You have to pay to get out of, Going through all these things twice.”

2008-2009 (in fact from 2006 onward) was a substantial US government monitoring failure, and here we are again (more below.)

We distributed our daily research notes earlier than usual this morning after due to most regularly scheduled data already being out this week. The Swiss National Bank and Bank of Japan also held rates steady this morning, even if the latter increased its market intervention. Those are after the US FOMC had cancelled its Wednesday meeting and announcement after two major emergency rate cuts in the past two weeks dropped its base rate to the 0.00%-0.25% range.

As all of that news is in the markets (only pending the Peoples Bank of China announcement on Friday), it is back to the good news and bad news on the markets… mostly bad. Our Thursday reference to the old Stealers Wheel song ‘Stuck in the Middle with You’ no longer applies to US EQUITIES that have failed below key historic support (more below.)

The JUNE S&P 500 FUTURE (front month as of Friday) was already trading at a 12 point discount to the March contract, and both are below the December 2018 2,413-09 UP Closing Price Reversal signal we have heavily referenced in recent analysis.

This means that the higher 2,600 fresh major weekly channel (from the January 2016 lows) DOWN Break will hold sway over the future trend activity. While there are some interim lower supports, the trend will likely continue lower.

This is reasonable in the context of the US government failure to effectively assess the spread of COVID-19, with little ability to do so without an effective testing mechanism. There was a great, very extensive Reuters article (https://reut.rs/3a2NyZh) on Thursday about how South Korea was much more prepared in any event, and how the US lacked the leadership on testing.

It is indeed a good question of ‘what price’ would have needed to be paid to avoid the current worst case scenario. The least of it would have been the US government allowing much sooner that COVID-19 was bad and getting worse here and elsewhere instead of demurring on any aggressive response.

So what’s the ‘good news’?

 

 

Read more...

Rohr Market Research

WEEKEND READ: COVID-19 Still Dominant

March 7, 2020 Rohr-Blog Leave a comment

2020/03/07: WEEKEND READ: COVID-19 Still Dominant

© 2020 ROHR International, Inc. All International rights reserved.

WEEKEND READ: Saturday, March 7, 2020

Everybody can get excited. Market participants are especially prone to being excitable. That was evident on recent sharp US equities rallies that ended with immediate reversion to the aggressive bear trend. This reinforces the dominance of the COVID-19 virus spread psychology in all asset classes.

After a week that saw some other seemingly important central bank and political influences, the COVID-19 virus spread in the US obviously remains the major US equities trend driver. Tuesday first saw anticipation and then the fact of the FOMC emergency 50 basis point rate cut, and then the surprise 'Super Tuesday' surge in ex-VP Biden's prospects as the likely Democratic Party candidate for President in November.   

Tuesday's sharp rally on the FOMC emergency rate cut saw knee-jerk buying driving US EQUITIES temporarily above resistance. Yet almost immediately afterward, they fell back sharply to the important lower support (more on all that below.) Wednesday saw the Biden electoral surge matched by temporary market euphoria, yet also reverting to a major selloff to the lower support by Thursday (as anticipated in Wednesday morning’s “‘Super Joe’, COVID Hope, FOMC Joke” research note.)

Thursday morning’s “C’mon in and Ride the Whip” research note was a very in-depth historic discussion of the why’s and how’s of extreme volatility from even before there were any financial futures. [We have added a repeat of that below. ]

The bottom line is Biden’s success in blunting the potential for a Socialist candidate for US President is not going to mean anything to the near-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak spreading across the US.

Surprising to some Fed fans is the FOMC surprise rate cut is also a non-factor. For more on that please see Friday morning’s Reuters article (https://reut.rs/3aE8ANP) that highlights the extensive criticism of both the recent and any future cuts as a cure for the economy being battered by the COVID-19 spread.

The bottom line is that nobody feels any better about resuming normal activity just because base rates are lower; especially when the longer dated govvies are already at record lows.

And the proof on display in the markets is the return of US EQUITIES aggressive downward momentum despite the Biden surge and FOMC 50 basis point cut (which we immediately deemed nothing more than a joke.) The COVID-19 driver for that along with other global developments can be reviewed in another Friday morning Reuters article (https://reut.rs/2ww1jAK) articulating the extent of the spread.  

Along with that GLOBAL GOVVIES are continuing their price surge (i.e. collapsing yields) with pressure on EMERGING CURRENCIES. Of note after its ‘haven’ bid as recently as two weeks ago, the US DOLLAR INDEX is under pressure on other DEVELOPED CURRENCIES surging against it (including the recently depressed JAPANESE YEN.)

While the volatility there is also historically extreme, it is not a surprise now that COVID-19 is spreading in the previously ‘safe’ United States.

In deference to the crisis remaining in full bloom and the broader investment and trading communities need to know, we have made the Extended Trend Assessment and full Evolutionary Trend View open source for just this post...

Read more...

Rohr Market Research

2019/11/10 Commentary: Santa Already in Town

November 10, 2019 Rohr-Blog Leave a comment

2019/11/10 Commentary: ‘Santa’ already in town (redux)

© 2019 ROHR International, Inc. All International rights reserved.

Extended Trend Assessments reserved for Platinum Subscribers

COMMENTARY: WEEKEND: November 10, 2019

‘Santa’ already in town (redux)

But is it Mr. Claus or someone else?

This year is a bit different than the end of last year (more so like 2017) in the context of just how upbeat the US equities performance has become into late year. Despite the overhang from the continuing US-China differences, it has been injected with steroids on the sense that those talks are continuing.

At the very least, any near term agreement will lead to the cancellation of the US tariffs increase that was supposed to be implemented into mid-December. The question over whether any 'Phase I' agreement amounts to nothing more than Donald Trump's need to 'declare victory and go home' remains (see Thursday's 'The Bank Overshadowed by US-China News' emailed research note for more.)

That this seems a bit more likely in the face of other pressures on Trump is moot in the near-term. The sight of him and Chinese President Xi signing any agreement will encourage thoughts of broader rapprochement to come; regardless of how far apart the two sides may remain on the more substantive critical issues.

However, US equities extended their rally into the end of last week despite first the Trump administration, and then the man himself, refuting Chinese claims that a broad tariffs rollback agreement had been agreed. So what could possibly be so influential as to overshadow the idea there are still stumbling blocks on the way to even the limited Phase I agreement? Well, in the context of the overall US equities strength finally extending late this year after stalling repeatedly against topping indications since July (see any recent research notes for more on that), there could already be a strong seasonal factor influencing the Evolutionary Trend View

The general psychology remains the same as any other strong year insofar as our long-standing views on the ‘Santa’ influence in the markets remains as always, yet based on something more than a jolly old guy in a red suit. In 2017 US tax reform certainly provided a plethora of blessings for US equities from multiple factors on the outlook into 2018. Of course, as the market is a ‘creature of expectations’, that is now being strongly reflected this year.

Whether or not the anticipated greater rapprochement between the US and China occurs, the anticipation that at least things are not going to become more acrimonious again in the near term can drive the US equities psychology. And that should then be accentuated by the need for under-invested individuals and especially portfolio managers to purchase equities on any setback (more below.)

While that leaves a 'hostage to fortune' in any return of overt US-China hostility, there is now quite a bit of substantial lower support in the US equities. As such, any fresh US-China confrontation would also need to be substantial to upset markets enough to drop US equities back below that now meaningful lower support; which is not really expected, at least not at this juncture.

Yet in the final analysis of the sheer equities trend, it is all very impressive and reinforces the natural tendency of ‘Santa Portfolio Manager’ to benefit others by needing to apply any excess cash to purchases of well-regarded stocks in positive equities years. 

Now we just need to see how the markets respond to the idea that there may be a revival of coordinated global economic strength if indeed there is a broader US-China rapprochement (which still seems quite far off in the distance.) Yet for now that anticipation (along with just a bit better European and Chinese economic data) has also weighed on global govvies and inspired an overall bid in emerging currencies (even if the latter faded a bit late last week despite US equities strength.)

The bigger foreign exchange question is why seemingly constructive Brexit developments along with the better global economic anticipation have not helped the euro or the British pound. Each of them has dropped back down to key lower support areas, which has brought some surprising strength to the previously weak US Dollar Index.

Yet none of that is going to derail the Santa Claus rally in the near-term. This can only occur in the (as noted above) unlikely event of a return of significant US-China acrimony.

▪ Based on this year’s extensive bullish anticipation, it is obvious that Santa is already in town. While he tends to increase his influence from Thanksgiving into the middle of December, he seems to be starting early this year on the positive US-China inferences noted above. As such, in spite of any setbacks it is likely the US equities will maintain their overall up trend into this month by holding setbacks, like the one they recently experienced on concerns over the Fed's less accommodative guidance (yet which was so short-lived.)

We suspect any December S&P 500 future downside reaction from higher Oscillator resistance will either hold into the lower 3,065-70 Oscillator threshold it overran last week, or at worst ratchet down to no worse than heavier support around that old July 3,030 area all-time high (with a Tolerance into the 3,025-15 range that was seen during the post FOMC sharp reaction.)

As this tendency goes back through many years of our late year seasonal analysis, we are very comfortable repeating our assessment from years gone by… [Original version posted Monday, December 23, 2013]

One of the key aspects which many market participants expect to be critical at this time of year is whether or not there will be a classical ‘Santa Claus’ equity market rally into the end of the year. And we say there is a certain element of humbug inherent in any such assumption.

Even as a Very Merry disposition is apparent in the recent major extension of the equities rally reinvigorated by the better prospects for US tax reform, the question remains “Who is this capitalistic, market profit-oriented ‘Santa’?” Of course, there is a question of whether anyone really believes Santa Claus exists in a market context in the first place, regardless of their personal life desire to believe or not.

In fact, the idea there is a Santa Claus which visits the broad market indices in December is at least a bit of a misnomer. In truth, as we have noted each year, any benefits to the broader market into December is more so due to ‘Santa Portfolio Manager’, and whether he decides to provide joy from his cash hoard to the other market participants.

And his tendencies in that regard are self-serving rather than altruistic. He must assess whether it looks smarter to be holding cash or holding stocks. And that in turn has to do with the position of the market indices relative to their highs or lows of the year. The further below their highs of the year (or indeed closer to their lows) the stock indices are trading into December, the less inclined that ‘Santa’ is to provide gifts to the other participants in the form of further purchases. Sort of a “Scrooge’s Scrooge” in those sorts of already trying times.

However, the closer the indices are to their highs of the year, the more so Santa Portfolio Manager is inclined to provide cash to the market so that he is fully invested at the calendar year-end… regardless of whether his overall returns for the year have been  spectacular or second-rate.

To wit (and to the tune of Santa Claus is Coming to Town)…

Verse:

He buys them when they’re lower,

He buys them when they’re high.

Can’t have any cash on the books

When New Year’s Day is nigh.

Refrain:

No need to pout,

No need to cry.

He’ll only shout,

“Buy, Buy, Buy.”

Santa Portfolio Manager’s

Coming to town.

▪ All previous analysis from the Market Observations (lower section, available to all Gold and Platinum subscribers) in our Weekend: Oddities and Anomalies? post that were updated after last Tuesday’s US Close remain the operative Evolutionary Trend View, except as updated in recent emailed notes. The next full Commentary will be posted once we have the final details of the US government budget deal that must be struck by the end of this week.

Thanks for your interest.

Rohr Market Research
Older posts
Newer posts →
  • Members Area

    • Sign-up here!
    • Sign-in here!
  • Rohr International Full Website Link

    Rohr's Website

  • Rohr International Overview

    • Alan Rohrbach Bio
    • Technicals are Rosetta Stone… and a ‘Little Secret’ About Rigid Schools
    • Rohr’s ‘Essential’ Macro-Technical Analysis Full Background Video… Benefit from the In-Depth Concept and Major Historic Applied Example
    • ‘Big Fed Cut’ with Phil Flynn at CME, also Biden with both “Meaningless” in the face of COVID-19 Surge
    • NOV 20 ‘Santa Baby!’ Follow-Up with Phil Flynn Post-FOMC (OCT 30) and Still Quite Bullish US Equities
    • Pre-FOMC (OCT 30) Interview at CME with Price Group’s Phil Flynn predicting further US equities rally
    • The ROHR Insight Advantage
    • Prescient Rohr Early 2008 Interview 12th Anniversary Relevant Lookback
  • ROHR FT Split Bond Views Letter

    January 12, 2024 - Strong Differing Bond Views Maybe Just a Sideshow
  • ROHR FT 2007 Déjà Vu Letter

    December 8, 2023 - Late 2023 Bond Market Looking A Lot Like mid-2007
  • ROHR FT ‘Medium’ Driver Letter

    November 27, 2017 - Why 'Medium' in the Electric Age is driving polarization
  • ROHR Financial Times ‘Risk’ Letter

    October 20, 2017 - Key View: Massive 'Tame' Passive Investment a Real Risk
  • Focused Rohr Expertise Centers

    Rohr Benefits, Perspective & Analytics Samples in a Nutshell. Take a Look…
  • Rohr Alert!! Active S&P 500 views

    • Current Rohr Trend Alert!! and Extended S&P 500 Oscillator Levels
    • Rohr Trend Alert!! Archives Available on a 2 Week Delay
  • Rohr Global Research Note

    • Current Rohr Research Note
    • Rohr Research Note Archive – Available on a 2 Week Delay
  • Rohr International Weekly Report & Event Color-Coded Calendar

    • Current Bi-Weekly Calendar
    • Bi-Weekly International Calendar Archives
  • Better Market Ideas from Independent Analysis…

    Advice both Institutional Investors and Highly Active Dealers/Traders want. And that is NOT at all just our view. Take a Look…
  • Blog Echelons Content & Fee Tables

    • Subscription Table with Fees. ‘Contact Us’ for 14-Day Free Trial
  • Rohr Global Services with Fees

    • Rohr Global Services: Basic Blog onto Full Institutional Advisory
  • Media

    • Rohr’s ‘Essential’ Macro-Technical Analysis Full Background Video… Benefit from In-Depth Concept and Major Historic Applied Example
    • Executive Series Topical Q&A with Ceres Limited’s Brian Jenkins
    • Television
    • Radio
    • Print
    • ‘Teachable Moment’ Analysis Videos from key price trend turning points. Some vintage (2013), some current, all relevant insights. (Accessible for Gold and Platinum subscribers only)
    • Rohr’s Macro-Market Daily e-zine with Multifaceted International Perspective and Broad-Based News (click the title to access the paper)
  • Rohr Website Pages

    • ‘New/Old’ Markets Paradigm
    • ROHR: Methodology & Perspectives
    • ROHR Client Testimonials
    • Alan Rohrbach’s LinkedIn Profile (requires LinkedIn membership)
  • Rohr-Blog Post Calendar

    May 2025
    M T W T F S S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
    « Jul    
  • Archives

  • Hottest Rohr-Blog Topics

    analysis Asia Australia BoE BoJ Bund China comments confluence DAX debt dollar Draghi ECB economic employment equities Euro Europe Fed fixed income FOMC Foreign Exchange FTSE GDP Germany Gilt Indicators inflation instability Japan macro macro-technical NIKKEI PMI Pound QE S&P 500 T-note technical TREND UK US dollar Yellen Yen
Copyright © 2011 Rohr International's Blog ...evolved capital markets insights
Top